Politics and History Chat - April 28, 2020
Link to Video on Facebook
Link to transcript
In this chat, HCR answered the following questions: 1) Is there any truth to voter fraud (or is it an excuse for voter-suppression)? 2) Why is the department of justice in the executive branch? Why doesn't the US have national healthcare? What her thoughts about sexual misconduct charges against Joe Biden? and what about states rights vs federal government? (the current governor 'pacts' differ from older secessionist movements, e.g. in the early and mid-19th century, in important ways -- first and foremost, there are no calls for secession; the focus is narrow, the COVID19 reponse; and the pacts are there to accomplish tasks that the federal authorities have explicitly abdicated)
Links (underlined) related to topics covered in the chat
‘Voter fraud’ is a myth that helps Republicans win, even when their policies aren’t popular
Heather Cox Richardson's article on this subject from 2018
How the Case for Voter Fraud Was Tested — and Utterly Failed
This article features Kris Kobach, who has come to embody the 'voter fraud' movement.
How the 2000 Election in Florida Led to a New Wave of Voter Disenfranchisement
"A botched voter purge prevented thousands from voting—and empowered a new generation of voting-rights critics"
The GOP House Thugs Followed the 2000 Brooks Brothers Riot Intimidation Playbook That Stopped the Florida Recount That Would Have Ended in Al Gore's Election
"The intimidating and physical harassment occurred at the Miami-Dade County Florida Board of Elections office a little over two weeks after the 2000 election. Bush was maintaining an infinitesimal lead of a little over 500 highly questionable votes over six million contested votes cast. Whoever won Florida won the presidency."....we know what happened
Election Fraud in the 1800s
The Mudsill Theory of James Henry Hammond, as presented in 1858
Lincoln's address in Wisconsin in 1859
"free labor -- the just and generous, and prosperous system, which opens the way for all -- gives hope to all, and energy, and progress, and improvement of condition to all."
Reform Movements in US history (through 1920)
Tax resistance in the United States
How Federal Agencies Suppressed Movement To Aid Freedpeople
The Racist Roots of Denying Incarcerated People Their Right to Vote
The Lost History of an American Coup D’État
judiciary act of 1789
establishes the Attorney General
History of the department of Justice
An American “redemption”? Trumpism fits a pattern of backlash against social progress.
Amos T Akerman
Ku Klux Act passed by Congress
A Brief History: Universal Health Care Efforts in the US
The Play 'Eleemosynary'
Northwest Ordinance
The Hartford Convention
[From wikipedia] Richardson’s first book, The Greatest Nation of the Earth (1997), stemmed
from her dissertation at Harvard University. Inspired by Eric Foner’s work on pre-Civil War
Republican ideology, Richardson analyzed Republican economic policies during the war. She
contended that their efforts to create an activist Federal Government during the Civil War
marked a continuation of Republican free labor ideology. These policies, such as war bonds
and greenbacks or the Land Grant College Act and the Homestead Act, revolutionized the role
of the Federal Government in the U.S. economy. At the same time, these actions laid the
groundwork for the Republican Party’s shift to Big Business after the Civil War.
In this 2001 book, Richardson "focused on the “Northern abandonment of Reconstruction.” Building
on the earlier work of C. Vann Woodward, she argued that a more complete understanding of the period
required appreciation of class, not only race. As Reconstruction continued into the 1870s and
especially the 1880s, Republicans began to view African Americans in the South more from a class
perspective and less from the perspective of race that had driven their earlier humanitarianism. In
the midst of the labor struggles of the Gilded Age, Republicans came to compare “the demands of the
ex-slaves for land, social services, and civil rights” to the demands of white laborers in the
North. This ideological shift was the key to Republican abandonment of Reconstruction, as they chose
the protection of their economic and business interests over their desire for racial equality."
[From wikipedia]
In this 2007 book, "Richardson presented Reconstruction as a national event that
impacted all Americans, not just those in the South. She incorporated the West into the
discussion of Reconstruction as no predecessor had. Between 1865 and 1900, Americans re-imagined the
role of the federal government, calling upon it to promote the well-being of its citizens. However,
racism, sexism, and greed divided Americans, and the same people who increasingly benefited from
government intervention—white, middle-class Americans—actively excluded African-Americans, Native
Americans, immigrants, and organized laborers from the newfound bounties of their reconstructed
nation." [from wikipedia]
In this book, published in 2010, Richardson "focused on the U.S. Army’s
slaughter of Native Americans in South Dakota in 1890. She argued that party politics
and opportunism led to Wounded Knee. After a bruising midterm election, President Benjamin
Harrison needed to shore up his support. To do so, he turned to The Dakotas, where he
replaced seasoned Indian agents with unqualified political allies, who incorrectly assumed
that the Ghost Dance Movement presaged war. The Army responded by sending one third of its
force in order to avoid spending cuts from Congress. After the event, Republicans tried to
paint the massacre as a heroic battle to stifle the resurgent Democrats." [wikipedia]
In this 2014 book, Richardson "extended her study of the Republican
Party into the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. This book studied the entire life
of the GOP, from its inception in the 1850s through the presidency of George W. Bush.
The party’s founders united against the “slave power,” a small group of wealthy white men
who controlled all three branches of government. These Republicans articulated a new vision
of an America in which all hardworking men could rise. But after the Civil War, Republicans
began to emulate what they originally opposed. They tied themselves to powerful bankers and
industrialists, sacrificing the well-being of ordinary Americans. A similar process took
place after World War II, when Republicans sought to dismantle successful New Deal policies
and prop up the wealthy. However, in both cases, reformers within the party were able to
return the GOP to its founding vision of equality of opportunity, first Theodore Roosevelt
during the Progressive Era, and then Dwight D. Eisenhower, who enforced integration and
maintained the New Deal. The Nixon and Reagan administrations have represented yet another
fall from the GOP’s founding purpose. It's ironic, Richardson points out, that Republicans
treated Barack Obama with an unprecedented level of disrespect, as Obama's rise from humble
beginnings to the highest office in the nation embodied the vision of the original
Republicans." [wikipedia]
In her most recent publication, Richardson argues "that America was founded with
contradicting ideals, with the ideas of liberty, equality, and opportunity on one hand,
and slavery and hierarchy on the other. United States victory in the American Civil War
should have settled that tension forever, but at the same time that the Civil War was
fought, Americans also started moving into the West. In the West, Americans found and
expanded upon deep racial hierarchies, meaning that hierarchical values survived in
American politics and culture despite the crushing defeat of the pro-slavery
Confederacy. Those traditions--a rejection of democracy, an embrace of entrenched
wealth, the marginalization of women and people of color--have found a home in modern
conservative politics, leaving the tremendous promise of America unfulfilled." [wikipedia]